Probio's increase influence in weft to living wight, karkas's weight, chest weight, thigh weight on and chicken bottom thigh broiler

  • Alexander Taek Nahak Faculty of Agriculture, Timor University
Keywords: Broiler’s chicken, Living wight, Karkas’s weight, Chest weight, Komersial Karkas’s Weight

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of adding probio in feed on live weight, carcass weight, breast weight, upper thigh weight, and lower thighs of broiler chickens. In this study 80 day old broiler chickens (DOC) were used. The method used was an experimental method with a completely randomized design (CRD) using 4 treatments and 4 replications. The treatments consisted of R0 = 100% commercial feed, R1 = 99.7% commercial feed + 0.3% probio, R2 = 99.5% commercial feed + 0.5% probio and R3 = 99.3% commercial feed + probio 0.7%. The results of analysis of variance showed that the use of probio in commercial feed had no significant effect on body weight, breast weight, upper thigh weight and lower thighs of broiler chickens but had a significant effect on carcass weight (P <0.05). The conclusion from the results of this study is that it can be concluded that the addition of probio in feed up to the level of 0.3% increases the weight of broiler chicken carcasses but does not affect the life weight, carcass percentage, weight and percentage of breast weight, percentage of thigh, upper thigh and lower thigh of broiler chickens at the age of 45 days.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blakely, J. and David H. B. 1991. The Science of Animal Hubandry. Printice-Hall Inc. New Jersey.

Daud, M. 2006. Persentase dan kualitas Ayam Pedaging yang diberi Probiotik dan Prebiotik dalam Ransum. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak, 6 (2) : 126-131.

Haroen,U. 2003. Respon ayam broiler yang diberi tepung daun sengon (Abizzania falcataria) dalam ransum terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil karkas. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Peternakan, 6 (1) : 34-41.

Isshiki, Y. 1979. Effect of lactobacili in the diet on the concentration of nitrogenus chikens. Japanese Poultry Sci, 16 (5) :254-258.

Manin, F. 2010. Potensi Lactobacillus acidophilusdan Lactobacillusfermentum dari Saluran Pencernaan Ayam Buras Asal Lahan Gambut sebagai Sumber Probiotik. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan, 13 (5) : 221-228.

Mountzouris K.C., P. Tsitrsikos, I. Palamidi, A. Arvaniti, M. Mohnl, G. Schatzmayr and K. Fegeros. 2010. Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins and cecal microflora composition. Poult. Sci, 89 (1) : 58 67.

Murtidjo, B. A. 1987. Pedoman Meramu Pakan Unggas. Kanisius. Yagyakarta.

Ramia, I.K. 2000. Suplementasi Probiotik dalam Ransum Berprotein Rendah terhadap Penampilan Itik Bali. Majalah Ilmiah Peternakan. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Udayana, Denpasar: 45-54.

Rasyaf,M. 1994. Makanan Ayam Broiler. Yayasan Kanisius, Yogyakarta.

Rizal, Y. 2006. Ilmu Nutrisi Unggas. Padang : Andalas University Press.

Ronstarci, T., Osfar, S. dan Irfan, H. D. 2007. Pengaruh Penambahan Probiotik Selulolitik (Cellulomonas Sp.) dalam Pakan Terhadap Kualitas Karkas, Lemak Abdominal dan Berat Organ dalam Ayam Pedaging. S2 Thesis. Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.

Soeparno, 1994. Ilmu Teknologi Daging. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Steel, C.J. dan J.H. Torrie.1995. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistik. PT. Gramedia. Jakarta.
Published
2019-04-30
How to Cite
Nahak, A. (2019). Probio’s increase influence in weft to living wight, karkas’s weight, chest weight, thigh weight on and chicken bottom thigh broiler. JAS, 4(2), 18-20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32938/ja.v4i2.563