Impact of PUAP Programs against Rice Farmer’s Income in Kupang District of East Nusa Tenggara Province

  • Umbu Joka Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Timor
  • Lukytawati Anggraeni Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University
  • Anna Fariyanti Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University
Keywords: Farm, Income, Impact, Rice

Abstract

Rural Agribusiness Development Program (PUAP) is a breakthrough program from Ministry of Agriculture for poverty reduction and job creation, while reducing the development gap between regions and regional centers and sub-sectors. The purpose of this study is on the impact of the PUAP program on analyze the income of rice farmers direct benefit recipients community (BLM) PUAP. The PUAP Program impact on Farmers income were analyzed using t-test, farm income analysis and linear regression model. The analysis showed PUAP program significantly affect farmer’s income.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adwiyana S.K, Wibowo A, Wijianto A. 2016. Hubungan Karakteristik Sosial Ekonomi Dengan Partisipasi Petani dalam Gerakan Penerapan Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu (GP-PTT) Kedelai di kecamatan Kedawung Kabupaten Sragen. Caraka Tani –Journal of Suistabinable Agriculture 31(2): 71-78.

[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi NTT 2014. Nusa Tenggara Timur dalam Angka. Kupang.

[Pemda] Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi NTT 2011b. Program Desa Mandiri Anggur Merah. Buku Panduan Pelaksanaan Program Anggur Merah. Kupang.

DeRosari B. 2014. Pengaruh Kredit dan bantuan Modal pada Perilaku Ekonomi dan Kesejahteraan Rumahtangga Tani di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Disertasi IPB.

Desai MD and BD Naik 1971. Prospects of Demand for Short-Term Institutional Credit for High-Yielding Varieties. Indian Journal of Agricultural economics. Bombay 26(4): 458-467.

Gotsch CH 1972. Technical Change and the Distribution of Income in rural Areas. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 54(2): 326-341.

Gujarati DN. 2004. Basic Econometrics Fourth Edition. The Mc Graw Hill- Companies (US): United States of America.

Hogdon LL. and H Singh 1966. Adoption of Agricultural Practices in Madhya Pradesh: Factors Associated with the Adoption of Recommended Agricultural Practices in Two Villages of Madhya Pradesh, Huderabad National Institute of Community Development, Hyderabad, India.

Ibrahim ALH and Bauer, S. 2013. Access to Micro credit and its Impact on Farm Profit Among Rural Farmers in Dryland of Sudan. Global Advanced Research Journal of Agricultural Science 2 (3): 88-102.

Kassa B, B Kassa and K Aregawi. 2014. Adoption And Impact of Agricultural Technologies On Farm Income: Evidence From Southern Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics. Vol. 2 (4): 91-106.

Kementerian Pertanian. 2015. Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Pembiayaan Pertanian Tahun 2014. Direktorat Jenderal Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian. KEMENTERIAN PERTANIAN.

Onyenweaku, C.E. and Nwaru, J.C. 2006. Application of stochastic frontier production function to the measurement of technical efficiency in food crop production in Imo State, Nigeria. The Nigerian Agricultural Journal 36:1 -2.

Suratiyah K 2011. Ilmu Usahatani. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.

Wati DR. 2015. Akses dan Dampak kredit Mikro terhadap Produksi dan Pendapatan Usahatani Padi Organik di Kabupaten Bogor. [Tesis]. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.

Zahri I dan Febriansyah A. 2014. Diversifikasi Usaha dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pendapatan Rumah Tangga Petani Padi Lebak. AGRISE. Vol. 14 (2):144-153.
Published
2019-09-09
How to Cite
Joka, U., Anggraeni, L., & Fariyanti, A. (2019). Impact of PUAP Programs against Rice Farmer’s Income in Kupang District of East Nusa Tenggara Province. AGRIMOR, 4(1), 13-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32938/ag.v4i1.624
Section
Original research article