The Relationship Between Adoption of Harvesting Technology and Income Levels of Rice Farmers (Case Study in Kolaka Regency, Southeast Sulawesi)

  • Campina Illa Prihantini Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
  • Syahrir Syahrir Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
  • Irna Irna Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
  • Masitah Masitah Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
Keywords: Income, Rice farming, Technology adoption

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the differences in the amount of labor costs, farm costs and income of paddy fields with Combine Harvester and Power Thresher harvesting technology in Lamedai Village, Tanggetada District, Kolaka Regency. The method of taking the number of samples by proportionate Stratified Random Sampling method and for the determination of the type of sample by Simple Random Sampling method as many as 52 samples. Each farmer who did farming with Combine Harvester harvesting technology as many as 29 samples and Power Thresher as many as 23 samples. The method of data analysis used in this study is the analysis of different test model independent sampleT-test. The results showed that there was a significant difference in total farming costs and rice revenues with Combine Harvester and Power Thresher harvesting technology in Lamedai Village, Tanggetada District, Kolaka Regency. The results showed that there is a real difference in income received by farmers who use power trasher machine with combine harvester. However,both still provide benefits and deserve to continue their business because the value of RC and BC ratio is positive. The suggestion that can be recommended is that farmers can be more familiar with the combine harvester machine so that the productivity of rice land is higher which also affects the income received by farmers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfajri, A. (2015). Mengenal prinsip kerja mesin panen padi. Diakses dari http://alfacell90.blogspot.co.id/2015/11/mengenal-prinsip-kerja-mesin-panen-padi.html. Pada tanggal 23 september 2022.

Amare dan Endalew. (2016). Agricultural Mechanization: Assessment Of Mechanization Impact Experiences on The Rural Population and The Implications for Ethiopian Smallholders. Engineering And Applied Sciences Journal. 1(2): 39-48.

Ambarsari, WVDY., Ismandi, B., dan Setiadi, A. (2014). Analisis pendapatan dan profibilitas usahatani padi Di Kabupaten Indramayu. Jurnal Agri Wiralodra. 6(2): 19-27.

Amin, M. & Prihantini, CI. 2021. Analisis Produksi dan Risiko Produksi Usahatani Cabai Rawit di Kecamatan Watunohu, Kabupaten Kolaka Utara. AGRIMOR. 6 (1): 15-21.

Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta (ID): Rineka Cipta

Aprilyanti, S. (2017). Pengaruh usia dan masa kerja terhadap produktifitas kerja (studi kasus: PT. OASIS water internasional cabang Palembang). Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industry]. Palembang (ID): Universitas Tridinanti Palembang.

Dahlan, SM. (2010). Besar Sampel dan Cara Pengambilan Sampel dalam Penelitian Kedokteran dan Kesehatan. Edisi 3. Jakarta (ID) Salemba Medika.

Darsani, YR. dan Subagio, H. (2016). Usaha Tani di lahan Rawa: Analisis Ekonomi dan aplikasinya. Jakarta (ID): IAARD Press

Ghozali, I. (2009). Aplikasi Analisis Multivaraite Dengan Program SPSS.Semarang (ID): Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Iswari, K. (2012). Kesiapan Teknologi Panen Dan Pascapanen padi dalam menekan kehilangan hasil dan meningkatkan mutu beras. [Jurnal Pertanian]. 31(2): 58-67.

Khoiri. A, (2018). Analisis Perbedaan Jumlah Kehilagan Hasil Produksi Dan Pendapatan Usaha Tani Padi Sawah (Oryza Sativa L) Dengan Teknologi Panen Combain Harverter dan Power Thresher. Desa Madang Baru. Kecamatan Medan Deras. Kabupaten Batu Bara. [Skripsi]. Medan (ID): Universitas Sumatra Utara.

Nasution, RH. (2019). Dampak Penggunaan Combine Harvester Terhadap Curahan Tenaga Kerja Dan Losses Pada Pemanenan Padi Sawah (Kasus: Desa Sidodadi, Kec Beringin, Kab. Deli Serdang). [Skripsi]. Medan (ID): Program Studi Agribisnis Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Soekarwati, (2011). Analisis Usahatani. Jakarta (ID): UI Press.

Sugiyono (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung (ID): Alfabet Press.

Prihantini, CI., Syaukat, Y., & Fariyanti A. (2017). Perbandingan Keuntungan Dengan Sistem Bagi Hasil Pada Usaha Garam Rakyat Di Kabupaten Pamekasan, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan Dan Perikanan. 12 (1): 107-120.

Prihantini, CI., Syaukat, Y., & Fariyanti A. (2017). Perbandingan Pola Bagi Hasil Dalam Usaha Garam Rakyat di Kabupaten Pamekasan, Jawa Timur. Jurnal Kebijakan Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan. 7 (1): 77-90.

Purba. (2015). Inovasi Teknologi Mesin Panen Mini Combine Harvester Mendukung Penanganan Panen dan Pascapanen Padi di Kalimantan Barat.Kalimantan Barat (ID): Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian. 2 (5) 1382-1386.
Wanda, FFA. (2015). Analisis Pendapatan Usaha Tani Jeruk Siam (Studi Kasus Di Desa Padang PangrapatKecamatan Tanah Grogot Kabupaten Paser). Kalimantan Timur (ID: J. Administrasi Bisnis, 3(3), 600-611.

Zainal, IDA. (2013). Evaluasi kesesuaian lahan kualitatif dan kuantitatif tanaman padi tadah hujan (Oriza zativa L) pada lahan kelompok tani karya subur di desa pasawaran indah kecamatan padang cermin kabupaten pesawaran. Lampung (ID): Universitas Lampung.
Published
2024-01-22
How to Cite
Prihantini, C., Syahrir, S., Irna, I., & Masitah, M. (2024). The Relationship Between Adoption of Harvesting Technology and Income Levels of Rice Farmers (Case Study in Kolaka Regency, Southeast Sulawesi). AGRIMOR, 9(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32938/ag.v9i1.2257
Section
Original research article